Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
4,276 - 4,300 of 12,949 collection items
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds That Failure to Voluntarily Depart Does Not Trigger Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine

Unpublished BIA decision reverses IJ’s finding that respondent’s failure to leave under a grant of voluntary departure triggered the fugitive disentitlement doctrine, noting that he had been complying with an order of supervision. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ba, 3/29/18)

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 19021542. Adjustment of Status, Crimes, Removal & Relief

Letter from Medical Professionals to ICE Against Inhumane Detention Policies for Pregnant Women

The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Academy of Family Physicians sent a letter to ICE expressing serious concerns about the change in policy of presumptive release of pregnant women from immigration detention facilities.

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040201. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief

TRAC Report Outlines Where Immigrants Are Being Detained

TRAC released a report, outlining where immigrants with immigration court cases are being detained. Nearly two thirds of the immigrants who have been detained during immigration court proceedings were housed in just twenty-five counties, with ten counties in Texas and California at the top.

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032936. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

ICE Formalizes Inhumane Detention Policies for Pregnant Women

In a joint statement with the American Immigration Council, AILA responds to a recently released ICE directive that formalizes the agency’s practice of detaining pregnant women.

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032937. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Provides FAQs on Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant Detainees

ICE released FAQs on its policy change regarding detaining pregnant individuals, stating that it has ended the presumption of release for all pregnant detainees. FAQs discuss the previous policy, if detaining pregnant women is a human rights abuse, and pregnant women claiming asylum.

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18033060. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Denies Petition for Review of Denial of Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Protection to Guatemalan Quiché Petitioners

The court denied the petition for review, holding, among other things, that the petitioners did not show that the government of Guatemala condoned the actions of those who mistreated the petitioners or was unable or unwilling to protect them. (Olmos-Colaj v. Sessions, 3/29/18)

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040341. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Denies Petition for Review Challenging BIA’s Denial of Motion to Reopen

The court found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed the petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely. The court also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction his challenge to the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen. (Reyes v. Sessions, 3/29/18)

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040431. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Finds Petitioner Removable Where CSA Drug Schedules Were Broader at Time of Conviction Than at Time of Removal

The court found that the BIA did not err in determining that the petitioner’s federal drug trafficking conviction made him removable, even though the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) schedules of drugs were broader at time of conviction than at the time of removal. (Doe v. Sessions, 3/29/18)

3/29/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040434. Asylum, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Fact Sheet: Policies and Procedures Involving Detained Parents and Legal Guardians

ICE released a fact sheet with its current policy and procedures addressing considerations when detaining and removing parents and legal guardians of minor children.

3/28/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032830. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

EOIR Extension of Comment Request Period on Proposed Revisions to Form EOIR-26A

EOIR 30-day extension of a comment period on proposed revisions to Form EOIR-26A, Fee Waiver Request. Comments are now due 4/26/18. (83 FR 13146, 3/27/18)

3/27/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032733. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Holds That “Egregious Violation” Exclusionary Rule Applies to State and Local Officers

The court held that the “egregious violation” exclusionary rule applies in civil deportation proceedings to state and local officers, and that the petitioner did not prove an egregious violation by state law enforcement of his Fourth Amendment rights. (Sanchez v. Sessions, 3/27/18)

3/27/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040440. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Board of Immigration Appeals Practice Manual (3/23/18)

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) provided an updated Practice Manual (last revised on March 23, 2018). This manual describes procedures, requirements, and recommendations for practice before the BIA.

3/23/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040936. Removal & Relief
Congressional Updates

P.L. 115-141: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018

On 3/23/18, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (H.R. 1625) to fund the government until September 30, 2018.

Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

AG Invites Amicus Briefs on Continuances for Adjudication of Collateral Matters

The Attorney General referred BIA decisions to himself for review of when there is "good cause" to grant a continuance to adjudicate a collateral matter. Amicus briefs are due by 4/22/18. AILA is seeking the underlying decisions. Matter of L-A-B-R- et al., 27 I&N Dec. 245 (A.G. 2018)

3/22/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032243. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Advisory: Prolonged Detention Challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez

On 3/21/18, ACLU, ACLU of Southern California, and Stanford Immigrants’ Rights Clinic published a practice advisory on prolonged detention challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez.

3/21/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032201. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

Congress Set to Approve Funding Deal, Leaves Dreamers Out in the Cold

With Congress set to approve billions of additional funding for immigration enforcement as part of the spending package funding the federal government through September 30, AILA President Annaluisa Padilla noted, “It is absolutely shameful that there is no solution for Dreamers in this legislation.”

3/21/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032107. DACA, Deferred Action, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Denies Petition for Review Where Defendant Failed to Raise the Issue of the Realistic Probability Test

The court found that the BIA did err in its application of the categorical approach to the petitioner’s conviction, but denied the petition for review because the petitioner failed to address the issue of the realistic probability test in his brief. (Vazquez v. Sessions, 3/21/18)

3/21/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040441. Crimes, Removal & Relief

ACLU Affiliates Sends Letter to Greyhound Buses on Immigration Raids

ACLU affiliates sent a letter to Greyhound on its practice of permitting CBP agents to routinely board its buses and question passengers about their citizenship and immigration status, stating Greyhound has the right to deny CBP permission to board and search its buses without a judicial warrant.

3/21/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040340. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds That Term “Entry” Retains Pre-IIRIRA Meaning

Unpublished BIA decision holds that the term “entry” in INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i) was not affected by the passage of the IIRIRA and thus does not apply to LPRs returning from a trip abroad that was innocent, casual, and brief. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Espinoza-Ramirez, 3/20/18)

3/20/18 AILA Doc. No. 19021538. Admissions & Border, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Finds New Jersey Conviction for Receiving Stolen Property to Be an Aggravated Felony

The court denied the petition for review, holding that a conviction under N.J. Stat. Ann. §2C:20-7(a) for receiving stolen property is categorically an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(G). (Lewin v. Sessions, 3/20/18)

3/20/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040435. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Vacates Matter of Jimenez-Cedillo

The court remanded to the BIA, holding that the BIA’s failure to provide a reasoned explanation as to why it abandoned its precedent regarding when a sexual offense against a minor is a CIMT was arbitrary and capricious. Courtesy of Ben Winograd. (Jimenez-Cedillo v. Sessions, 3/20/18)

3/20/18 AILA Doc. No. 18032933. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Chapter Documents

ICE ERO/AILA South Florida Liaison Meeting Minutes (Spring 2018)

Minutes from the South Florida Chapter’s Spring 2018 meeting with the ICE ERO office.

3/20/18 AILA Doc. No. 18082336. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

DHS Notice of Modification of “DHS/ICE-013 Alien Health Records System” System of Records

DHS notice of the proposed modification and reissuance of the “DHS/ICE-013 Alien Health Records System” system of records, which contains health records on ICE detainees. Comments are due 4/18/18. (83 FR 12015, 3/19/18)

3/19/18 AILA Doc. No. 18031930. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA10 Holds that Violation of 18 USC §1542 Is Categorically a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude

The court held that a violation of 18 USC §1542 for making a false statement in a passport application is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. (Afamasaga v. Sessions, 3/19/18)

3/19/18 AILA Doc. No. 18040445. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum Where Evidence Showed Persecution Was Based on an Economic Motive

The court denied the petition for review, finding that substantial evidence showed that the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for asylum by failing to show a nexus between his alleged persecution and a statutorily protected ground. (Lopez-Lopez v. Sessions, 3/16/18)

3/16/18 AILA Doc. No. 18031637. Asylum, Removal & Relief