Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
826 - 850 of 12,949 collection items
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial to Honduran Petitioners Who Received Death Threats as Family Unit

Upholding the BIA’s denial of petitioners’ request for asylum, the court held that petitioners’ receipt of death threats in Honduras as a family unit did not convert the non-protected criminal motivation into persecution on the basis of family connections. (Barnica-Lopez v. Garland, 2/8/23)

2/8/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021504. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds BIA Failed to Comply with Court’s Prior Remand Order by Not Considering Significant Documentary Evidence

The court concluded that, in rejecting the petitioner’s withholding of removal claim, the BIA on remand again failed to properly consider significant documentary evidence, and thus vacated the Board’s removal order and remanded for further proceedings. (Aguilar-Escoto v. Garland, 2/7/23)

2/7/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021502. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Rejects Petitioner’s Argument That BIA Failed to Analyze All the Avetisyan Factors in Denying Motion to Reconsider

The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider the denial of an administrative closure of his removal proceedings, rejecting his claim that BIA did not analyze all the Matter of Avetisyan factors. (Islas-Saldana v. Garland, 2/7/23)

2/7/23 AILA Doc. No. 23022304. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Petitioner Who Had Allegedly Been Arrested and Tortured by Cameroonian Government

The court rejected the Cameroonian petitioner’s argument that the BIA had ignored substantial record evidence, including country-conditions evidence that allegedly corroborated his claims for asylum and related relief. (Mohndamenang v. Garland, 2/6/23)

2/6/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021706. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Finds That Petitioner with Two Drunk Driving Convictions Lacked Good Moral Character for Cancellation Purposes

The court held that the BIA properly found that petitioner’s history of alcohol abuse and his two convictions for drunk driving showed a lack of good moral character for purposes of cancellation of removal, and thus denied the petition for review on the merits. (Hernandez v. Garland, 2/6/23)

2/6/23 AILA Doc. No. 23022303. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Announces 23 New Immigration Judges

EOIR announced the appointment of 23 immigration judges to courts in California, Connecticut, Georgia, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Texas, and Virginia.

2/6/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020709. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

SmartLINK: The ICE Electronic Monitoring Application on Your Client’s Phone

AILA provides members with a factsheet on the SmartLINK Phone application used by ICE within its Alternatives to Detention Program. The factsheet includes information on how it operates and its functionality.

2/3/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020307. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Remands CAT Claim of Petitioner Who Was Hospitalized Following Police-Aided Assault in Guatemala

Where the petitioner had fled Guatemala after he had been hospitalized following an assault that appeared to be aided by the police, the court granted the petition for review as to the petitioner’s Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim and remanded. (Hernandez-Martinez v. Garland, 2/2/23)

2/2/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021500. Asylum, Removal & Relief

CRS Legal Sidebar: The Effect of Private Immigration Legislation and Recent Policy Changes

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) provides a legal sidebar with a brief history of private immigration bills and ICE’s handling of individuals who are the subject of these bills.

2/1/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020203. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and Partners Submit Amicus on the Encouragement Provision

AILA and partners submit an amicus to the Supreme Court in United States v. Hansen arguing that the Encouragement Provision chills vast quantities of immigration advice from attorneys and others and is overbroad and invalid under the First Amendment.

2/1/23 AILA Doc. No. 23033003. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Updates the Judicial Complaint Process

EOIR issued a document that describes its process for handling judicial complaints.

2/1/23 AILA Doc. No. 23081732. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Says Petitioner’s Conviction for Sexual Abuse in New York Constituted Sexual Abuse of a Minor Under INA §101(a)(43)(A)

The court dismissed in part the petition for review, holding that petitioner’s conviction for second-degree sexual abuse under NY Penal Law §130.60(2) was a categorical match for sexual abuse of a minor under INA §101(a)(43)(A) and was thus an aggravated felony. (Debique v. Garland, 1/27/23)

1/27/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021505. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says BIA Erred in Finding Petitioner Who Was Perceived to Be a Lesbian in Guatemala Had Not Suffered Past Persecution

The court held that the BIA erred in finding that the harm suffered by the petitioner—who was verbally and physically harassed and received death threats because her community in Guatemala perceived her to be a lesbian—did not rise to the level of persecution. (Antonio v. Garland, 1/26/23)

1/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23030305. Asylum, LGBTQ, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Reverses Grant of Summary Judgment to ICE in FOIA Lawsuit

The court held that ICE was required to substitute Unique Identifying Numbers (Unique IDs) for deleted Alien Identification Numbers (A-Numbers) in producing the otherwise non-exempt records responsive to the plaintiff’s FOIA request. (ACLU Immigrants’ Rts. Project v. ICE, 1/26/23)

1/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020301. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Finds BIA Erred in Denying Withholding and CAT Relief to Indigenous Petitioner from Guatemala Who Feared Persecution by Gang

Vacating the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief, the court held that the BIA erred in finding that the Guatemalan petitioner did not experience past persecution by a local gang due to his indigenous identity. (Saban-Cach v. Att’y Gen., 1/25/23)

1/25/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020708. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on Statutory Rape Offenses

AILA and partners submitted an amicus brief in Negriel v. Garland arguing that Esquivel-Quintana establishes conclusively that a statutory rape offense can only be "sexual abuse of a minor" if the age of consent is 16 or lower.

1/25/23 AILA Doc. No. 23030603. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Upholds BIA’s Denial of Motion to Reopen After Finding Petitioner Lacked Good Moral Character

Where the Mexican petitioner had two convictions for driving while intoxicated, the court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen his cancellation of removal application based on a lack of good moral character. (Cruz-Velasco v. Garland, 1/24/23)

1/24/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020902. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Finds That “Witnesses Who Cooperate with Law Enforcement” Is Not a PSG

The court held that the BIA and IJ did not err in finding that the Guatemalan petitioner had failed to demonstrate that “witnesses who cooperate with law enforcement” constituted a particular social group (PSG) for purposes of asylum eligibility. (Lemus-Coronado v. Garland, 1/23/23)

1/23/23 AILA Doc. No. 23021403. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Asylum Seekers File Class Action Lawsuit Challenging ICE’s Disclosure of Confidential Information in Data Breach

The plaintiffs, asylum seekers who had been detained in ICE custody, filed a class action lawsuit in federal district court alleging that the defendants unlawfully published their private data to ICE’s website. (Asylum Seekers Trying to Assure Their Safety v. Johnson, et al., 1/20/23)

1/20/23 AILA Doc. No. 23012500. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Additional Information Relating to Data Breach from ICE

ICE invited stakeholders to an engagement session to discuss its response to the inadvertent disclosure of PII of approximately 6,000 individuals in the credible fear process. As a supplement to that engagement, this additional information was circulated to stakeholders.

1/19/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020202. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Says Petitioner’s Conviction for Attempted First-Degree Assault in New York Is a Crime of Violence

Denying the petition for review, the court concluded that the petitioner’s conviction for attempted first-degree assault in violation of New York Penal Law §§110.00, 120.10(1) was a crime of violence under 18 USC §16(a). (Singh v. Garland, 1/19/23)

1/19/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020707. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Provides FAQs on the Unintentional Disclosures of PII

ICE issued FAQs after unintentionally posting personally identifiable information, along with immigration information, of approximately 6,000 noncitizens in ICE custody. DHS also communicated to Cuba 103 names of individuals previously provided for removal processing were part of the ICE disclosure.

1/18/23 AILA Doc. No. 23011904. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds IJ’s Denial of Withholding of Removal to Petitioner Who Feared Gang Violence in El Salvador

The court found that the IJ did not err by concurring with an asylum officer’s determination that the petitioner, who claimed that he feared violence from gangs in El Salvador, did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture. (Reyes-Ramos v. Garland, 1/13/23)

1/13/23 AILA Doc. No. 23020706. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Will Streamline and Expedite Deferred Action for Noncitizen Workers Supporting Labor Enforcement Investigations

DHS announced that noncitizen workers who are victims of or witnesses to the violation of labor rights can now access a streamlined and expedited deferred action process, effective immediately.

1/13/23 AILA Doc. No. 23011351. Deferred Action, Employer Compliance, Removal & Relief
Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Releases Updated Memo on the Confiscation and Return of Original Documents

ICE issued a memo providing policy and procedures for confiscating and returning original documents until initiation of removal proceedings against any detained or non-detained noncitizen.

1/13/23 AILA Doc. No. 23102502. Removal & Relief